![]() |
||
| Thought Leaders: Finance | ||
| Stepping Out of the Pool
Roger Ehrenberg 10/01/2007 |
||
The United States houses one of the most vibrant and innovative capital markets in the world, and Oaktree Capital Management’s initial offering of shares on Goldman Sach’s private GS TrUE (Tradable Unregistered Equity) exchange, launched in May, is the most recent example of innovation in action. By selling shares to accredited investors via GS TrUE, instead of going public on the NYSE or Nasdaq, Oaktree, a Los Angeles–based alternative investment manager, avoided onerous and costly registration and disclosure requirements while maintaining a level of privacy unachievable in a U.S. public offering.
The emergence of alternate private exchanges, much like the rise of "dark pools" such as Liquidnet, is a function of market opportunity. GS TrUE is an outgrowth of the accredited investor rules, Sarbanes-Oxley, institutional investors’ abundance of cash and a scarcity of new blue-chip supply. Clearly, Oaktree benefited by avoiding SEC oversight and public disclosures by issuing on GS TrUE, but the company played within the accredited investor rules and in no way pushed the boundaries as they exist. It simply took advantage of its track record, reputation and investor demand to float shares at an attractive valuation without providing more information than was required. This is smart and opportunistic corporate governance, nothing more. The harder question is what impact this will have on U.S. capital markets in general. The success of private exchanges allows a pool of the most desirable public IPO candidates to opt out of the public markets. Not every company can succeed in the private market. A viable company is one with a strong track record and seasoned managers who can clearly demonstrate leadership abilities and favorable growth potential to investors performing due diligence.
This does not mean every blue-chip IPO candidate will choose a private exchange. Some will want a broader shareholder base than the limit of 500 on the private exchanges; others may feel that, because of their consumer appeal, they could command a premium valuation in the public markets. In the case of Oaktree, the company did not have to become listed anywhere, but the GS TrUE structure gave it the best of both worlds: the liquidity it desired and the high-quality product investors wanted. In the absence of material changes to Sarbanes-Oxley and the rules by which public companies disclose their activities, private exchanges facilitate issuance by blue-chip companies that might not happen otherwise. This is good for the financial system, issuers and investors because it facilitates capital formation and liquidity. But if Congress and the SEC want to see a robust, inclusive
public market that is attractive to all issuers, they have some work to do.
Disclosure requirements need to be clarified and simplified. The costs of
compliance, particularly for small- and medium-size firms, have to come down.
While confidence in a firm’s financial statements and disclosures is absolutely
critical, the burden of compliance shouldn’t impede the ability to deliver goods
and services and to create value for customers, employees and shareholders.
Until this happens, private exchanges will continue to play an important role in
the capital formation process. Roger Ehrenberg is president and chief operating officer of Monitor110, a New York–based financial intelligence firm, and author of the business blog Information Arbitrage. |