subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Commentary-People / Politics, Policy & Finance /
Decision 2004
Paying for Lunch
Michael Sisk
09/01/2004

Bruce Bartlett, a veteran of the Reagan administration, who is now a senior fellow at the National Center for Policy Analysis, agrees that Wall Street sentiment or a market-moving event—such as a crisis in the housing sector—will force politicians to take action on the deficit faster than any election-year posturing. “There will be a triggering event—I’d guess within the next year or so—that turns the deficit from a nonissue to an issue,” he predicts.

“It’s widely agreed by experts on both sides that the combination of entitlements and tax breaks is not sustainable.”
The deal will most likely involve large tax increases, Bartlett opines. To get Wall Street’s attention, 1 percent to 2 percent of GDP per year will need to be redirected toward deficit reduction; half of that, about $100 billion, will have to come from taxes, he predicts. To put that in perspective, Kerry’s rollback of tax cuts for families earning more than $200,000 would only net about $25 billion—none of which he has earmarked for deficit reduction.

All this is giving professional wealth managers and their clients a lot to contemplate. “The old knee-jerk that a tax deferred is a tax saved may not be true now,” JP Morgan’s Weigandt explains. “With a 15 percent capital gains rate, it’s hard to imagine it going any lower.”

“The GOP has a 21-seat margin in Congress, so it’s unlikely that, even if Kerry wins, you’re going to have a huge Democratic majority in Congress. You’re more likely to have gridlock. It’s not going to be as easy as Kerry is expecting it to be to roll back all of the Bush tax cuts.”

 —Holly Isdale, managing director, Lehman Brothers
Sunset Schedule
The Bush administration’s tax cuts are only temporary—although if the administration gets a second term it may labor to make them permanent. Here are the current sell-by dates:

Income Tax: The top marginal rate remains 35 percent until 2011, when it reverts to its 2001 level of 39.6 percent.

Capital Gains: This tax remains at 15 percent until 2009, at which point it reverts to 20 percent.

Dividends: The tax on dividends is 15 percent until 2009, when it reverts to the taxpayer’s marginal rate, up to 39.6 percent.

Estate Tax: The exclusion on the estate tax increases, and the tax itself declines, in stages until 2010, when the rate falls to zero. The next year the tax rate reverts to 55 percent on everything above $1 million.

Illustration by Matt Mahurin.

Additional Information
When the Levies Break
Taxing Decisions
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» Taxing Decisions
» When the Levies Break
» The Transition Problem
» Wealth after Katrina
» Guarded Optimism
 
FREE ISSUE! FREE GIFT!

Get your instant FREE GIFT of the top 25 QUESTIONS you must ask your advisor!

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE GIFT. If you like it, pay just $40.00 for 9 more issues (10 in all). If it’s not for you, write ‘cancel’ on the invoice, return it, and you owe nothing! The FREE issue and FREE GIFT are yours to keep!
Name
Address

BONUS: Pay now and receive two extra issues absolutely FREE! That’s 12 issues total! (click here)

Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference