 |
Collecting art has never been more enjoyable–or more competitive. The volumes,
prices and publicity in the fine art market have burgeoned in the past decade,
attracting crowds of educated, well-informed aficionados. Meanwhile, a new
seriousness about the investment aspects of collecting has partially supplanted
the formerly more genteel approach, particularly among those interested in
contemporary art. Perhaps this is due to the sums involved: Ten years ago, a
celebrated midcareer artist might have commanded $25,000 to $50,000 for a piece.
Today, similar works sell for up to $1 million.
While collectors in past ages
typically kept their portfolios out of the public eye, often only allowing
carefully chosen guests to view their treasures, savvy enthusiasts today tend to
publicize their acumen by creating private museums, well-documented catalogs or
professionally managed collections. Some manage their holdings like stock
portfolios, striving to upgrade the quality at every opportunity—even if
they prefer to think of these activities as pursuing refinement rather than
chasing investment returns. In any case, putting our collections on pedestals
for all to view not only serves the public good, but may significantly increase
interest in the artists we support, and thereby boost their works’ investment
value.
TOP VIEW The days of the discreet art patron and the exclusive collection may
be waning. Art has become a heady, global business, and it drives collectors
today to assemble their portfolios with a view to bringing the works,
eventually, into the public arena. |
Our compulsion to bring our art into the public arena might involve
the expensive and elaborate process of creating our own institution to display
it, though many of us take a path of lesser resistance and simply lend our
collections to museums. Whichever we choose, we will find the lifelong process
of assembling and displaying a portfolio will leave our commitment to our
favorite art, our beloved artists, even our primal sense of aesthetics
challenged and, to be sure, heightened.
The experiences and insights of four
leading contemporary collectors illustrate the range of motivations and
strategies that may inform our decisions on what art to collect, and how to
display it.
Youthful Passions David and Danielle Ganek, both in their mid-30s, live in
a stone house in Connecticut with their three children. He runs a hedge fund
called Level Global, and she is a former magazine creative director now working
on her first novel. They have been collecting art for nearly 20 years, having
begun at truly tender ages. Art—and mostly then it was photography—was one of
the things that brought the two of them together when they started dating right
out of college. David has an edge as a second-generation collector; his parents
were contemporary art collectors. Over the past six years, however, the younger
Ganeks have become a force in the art world.
They have had their most
profound effect as members of the Stieglitz Society at New York’s Metropolitan
Museum of Art. The Ganeks engineered a complex transaction with the estate of
the late Diane Arbus, one of the finest photographers of the last century, to
purchase 23 rare, signed vintage prints. They worked together with the museum to
choose from the available prints, and, with a purchase of more than $2 million,
the Ganeks will give 13 of the photographs to the Met and retain 10 for
themselves. As New Yorkers, they felt it was important to place such important
New York art in a local institution. The Ganeks will live with all the works for
a period of time before handing over 13 to the museum. (Six of the photos are
currently traveling around the country with the Arbus museum
retrospective.)
The Ganeks will add the Arbus photos to what is already one
of the leading collections of the 1990s, with important works by Damien Hirst,
Richard Prince, Jeff Koons, Cindy Sherman and Maurizio Cattelan. Danielle
describes their collecting in none-too-uncertain terms as a “52-week-a-year
activity focused on the art of our time. Once it becomes part of your life, it
seems to take over.”
Museums around the world have approached the Ganeks to
lend parts of their collection, but they remain highly selective about where
they exhibit. Their knowledge of this art milieu has begun to rival that of many
curators, and they insist on knowing the context of each exhibition and the
works that will be on display.
The Ganeks insist that increasing the value of
their collection is not the motive behind their desire to lend their art. It
does bring other benefits, however. David notes, “Being good lenders encourages
dealers to sell us other works in which we are interested.”
That their
motivation is more aesthetic than material becomes evident when they describe
what drives their collective passion. “Our transition to being much more active
speaks to how addictive the whole process is,” Danielle explains. The more one
learns and sees, the more one wants to learn and see. The more a person studies
one artist, they say, the more that person then looks at another artist who was
influential.
Multicultural Benefactor Marieluise (Marlies) Hessel has been collecting
art for three decades, since she was in her early 20s. Long described as one of
the most beautiful women in the art world, Hessel was born in Germany and has
lived in both the United States and Mexico. With her husband of three years, Ed
Artzt, former CEO of Procter & Gamble, Hessel now divides her time between
homes in Jackson Hole, Wyo., and New York, where works by Roy Lichtenstein, Cy
Twombly and Morris Louis fill their apartment.
Hessel, who says her wealth
stems from investments, began, as many young collectors do, buying works of the
artists of her time. Fortuitously, these turned out to be some of Europe’s most
important post-World War II figures, men such as Joseph Beuys, Gerhard Richter
and Sigmar Polke. Now, she admits, she has “developed a strict guideline as to
what I collect and deal with—art that addresses issues of identity that deal
with gender, race and nationality.”
Her other luminaries include artists such
as Felix Gonzalez-Torres, Janine Antoni and Gabriel Orozco. “I have an emotional
need to collect that leads to a need to connect to the work. When I felt lonely,
I would go the museum and look at Rembrandts or Durer to find relief,” Hessel
recalls. “While I collect many difficult works, sometimes I also like
beauty.”
She has actively distinguished her collection by founding the Center
for Curatorial Studies at Bard College in Annandale-on-Hudson, N.Y. On a trip to
Russia in 1987, she met Bard President Leon Botstein, who planted the idea to
put her collection in a small town with a school and research center.
Today her
congeries of some 1,750 pieces is on permanent loan to the center, along with
archives of books and videos. Her mission is to provide both a research facility
for 20th-century art and a locus for scholars to conduct comparative studies of
art with literature and music. Graduate students study Hessel’s works, while she
is content to buttress a foundation that preserves the collection in its
wholeness.
“I was multicultural before it was politically correct, and I
always saw art in a societal context,” she says. “With Bard, there will be an
end point to the collection that I want to enjoy.”
Corporate Curator Donald B. Marron, CEO and founder of the private equity
investment firm Lightyear Capital in New York, began collecting art in the late
1960s at the financial firm Mitchell Hutchins, where he was president. He
expanded his corporate and personal collections during his 20 years as chairman
of PaineWebber and through its subsequent merger with UBS AG. A standout in any
art crowd at his basketball-player height of 6 feet, 7 inches, Marron is also a
longtime board member and former president of the board of the Museum of Modern
Art in New York. So it was no great surprise when he turned to MoMA in 2002 to
make an outright gift of 37 important works of modern and contemporary art from
the corporate UBS PaineWebber Collection. While it was an enormously generous
gift by the standards of the art world, it was still a minor ripple on the
corporation’s bottom line. The newly renovated MoMA will display the works,
featuring artists such as Willem de Kooning, Philip Guston and Susan Rothenberg,
when it reopens in 2005.
 | MARRON COLLECTION Donald Marron in front of a Willem de Kooning painting. | Marron believes that it is vital for his employees
and clients to be surrounded by fine art during the business day. “Contemporary
art reflects the society it lives in,” he explains. “And being in a
market-driven business, we need to be exposed to it.” He has hung art in offices
around the world throughout his career and continues to do so at Lightyear. He
leveraged art as a useful marketing tool at UBS PaineWebber, continuing a
tradition of creating a vehicle for artists to develop audiences through
corporate collections. Marron made the work available to the public through
loans and exhibitions, a practice he intends to continue with the collection he
is building for his new company.
Marron is busily building a new assemblage
that focuses on artists whose works have captivated him for years: de Kooning,
Lucien Freud, Brice Marden, Tom Friedman and Neo Rauch. He recently obtained a
video work by Michal Rovner that fuses the antiquity of a tribal stone with the
mechanics of digital computer technology. He will show the Rovner piece in his
reception area, hoping to make a statement about the state of art today and in
the future for all his button-down visitors. The Spontaneous Salon Tim Nye brings an entrepreneur’s energy to his
activities in the art world. An active collector for more than 15 years, he is
an heir to the Uris real estate fortune. He has created his own wealth in
business ventures that have often attempted to merge the worlds of art, media
and entertainment—fitting endeavors for a man whose education combines an MBA
from Columbia University with a fellowship at the Independent Curatorial Study
Program at the Whitney Museum of American Art. Nye founded the music website
SonicNet in 1994 and sold it to MTVi in 1999. More recently, he restored a
long-abandoned Yiddish vaudeville house on the Lower East Side of Manhattan and
turned it into the Landmark Sunshine Cinema, a plush art-film house complete
with Japanese rock garden.
In 1991, Nye opened Thread Waxing Space in New
York’s Soho to present art exhibitions, performance art and music in a
not-for-profit environment. He closed it 10 year later, however, finding that
the space was becoming too institutional for his tastes, and that he was
becoming too removed from the curatorial climate he loved. He chose to continue
to think in his multidimensional ways as a collector and as a board member of
venues such as the Brooklyn Academy of Music.
The art that intrigues him
“balances the relationship between idea and execution,” says Nye. “I am
interested in the artist’s hand and what is being expressed.” He served as an
early champion of artists like Leonardo Drew and Alexis Rockman, who now form
the core of his collection. Nye initially focused on abstraction, but has now
moved to more narrative and layered artists such as the late Martin
Kippenberger. “One of the things I like about Kippenberger is the subversiveness
of luring you into the seductiveness of his imagery and surface,” Nye muses,
“only to deny you the pleasure of that gesture by marring the surface with his
own home-brewed bumper stickers.”
 | NYE COLLECTION Tim Nye in front of Leonardo Drew’s Number 32N, 2003. | Recently, Nye created a performance and
exhibition space called Foundation 2021. Here he collects and displays work by
emerging artists, affording him the pleasure of both acquiring and supporting
artists outside the traditional, commercial gallery system. “Foundation 2021 is
like an independent record label versus the major label,” Nye contends. “It’s
personal. It can react now to what I want to do quickly, be a spontaneous
salon.”
Aesthetic R&D Although fine art devotees such as David and Danielle
Ganek say that, for them, collecting is a 52-week-a-year activity, even they
cannot accomplish their goals alone. Most serious collectors employ the art
world’s version of a research and development department, in the form of art
advisors. The Ganeks work with Sandy Heller, a New York-based private advisor,
who continues to develop the future of their collection and ferrets out the best
examples from sources around the globe. Marlies Hessel boasts all the contacts a
collector of her status could, yet she still engages New York’s Allan
Schwartzman, one of the most sought-after independent art advisors, to fine-tune
the remaining portions of her collection.
Even fine art devotees cannot accomplish their goals alone. Most serious
collectors employ the art world’s version of research and development department, in the form of art advisors. |
Donald B. Marron credits three
people: the late Monique Beudert, his first curator; former MoMA staffer
Jennifer Wells; and his present advisor, the insightful Matthew Armstrong, who
became curator of Lightyear after working in the same position at UBS. They
provide “another set of expert eyes, who also help with the necessary research
and curatorial management of the collections,” Marron explains. Even the
Whitney-trained Tim Nye consults close friends and advisors in his inner circle.
With the help of skilled advisors, each of them has carved out a new definition
of what it means to be a collector today.
Josh Baer is a private art dealer who publishes The Baer Faxt, a
contemporary arts newsletter. Photography by Susan Anderson |